Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Connect with Mike

mike volpe twitter mike volpe facebook mike volpe linkedin mike volpe youtube mike volpe blog rss mike volpe google buzz Mike Volpe on Foursquare mike volpe slideshare mike volpe itunes podcast mike volpe qik live video


Marketing with Mike Volpe

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

University of Iowa Study Shows Marketing Impacts a Firm's Risk

Posted by Mike Volpe on Thu, Jul 09, 2009
 

One of the key things that investors typically look for in any investment is a low level of risk (given the predicted return).  A new study from the University of Iowa shows that firms that have a stronger brand (usually because of better marketing) have a lower risk, which is appealing to investors.

University of Iowa Markeitng Study

"Strong brands are associated with stronger cash flows that are more reliable and predictable in the future,"Rego said. "That means debt and equity holders have an easier time predicting the firm's future cash flows and that makes them less risky investments, increasing their long-term financial stability."

For an average company in their sample -- which had $10 billion in long-term debt with a BBB+ credit rating -- Billet said a two-category improvement would save the company almost $40 million in annual debt service alone. (quote from pres release)

This is an interesting finding that shows the value of maintaining a strong brand and the benefits a strong brand can bring to a large business.

"Most corporate executives see marketing as a cost center, not as an investment, but this study should remove all doubt that brands are assets and should be managed as such," Rego said. 

No argument here!

Want to see a study that focuses on marketing at small businesses?  Everything that I have seen at HubSpot from our 1,400 small businesses using our marketing software shows me that if a small business implements a well run inbound marketing program, they will get a huge marketing ROI (follow that link to see 2 of our studies).


Tags: 

COMMENTS

So for large companies carrying large amount of debt who initially start with a poor bond rating (BBB+ isn't anything to write home about and is at the cusp of "Upper Medium Grade" in bond ratings) , having marketing improves their bond rating, which saves money.  
 
Oddly, nothing seems to point to the original study for introspection of methods, sample size, assumptions, charts or conclusions. That being said, I emailed the Iowa page linked asking for such. I dislike basing business decisions off PR summaries only :) 
 
If their study is good, then it is definitely a nice ROI for that type of company on average, but I would like to see the spread of results as well.  
 
I MUCH prefer the studies that you guys have done at Hubspot to the study that Iowa has done. Theirs seems exceedingly narrow. I think you have spoken to a much larger audience and done a better job from what I have seen at drawing useful conclusions.

posted @ Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:09 AM by David Fisher


@David - I agree. I would love to have seen more details, but I thought it was interesting enough for my personal blog (if not the HubSpot blog, for the reasons you mentioned).

posted @ Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:48 AM by Mike Volpe


Comments have been closed for this article.