Subscribe by Email

Your email:

What is HubSpot?

mqlbutton_demo

Connect with Mike

Marketing with Mike Volpe

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Organization Chart 2.0 - An Org Chart Experiment at HubSpot

Posted by Mike Volpe on Wed, Sep 29, 2010
 

We have a pretty flat culture and organization at HubSpot.  No vacation policy.  No offices.  Limited layers to the organization.

As we have grown (we're now at roughly 180 people!) natural questions like "Who should I talk to about XYZ?" are coming up from people on the team.  The old way of answering these questions would be to create an Organization Chart (aka the "org chart") and show who reports to whom.  Then you go to a VP or Director in the right Department and she will send you to the right person.

But that doesn't seem to fit our company and culture.  We care less about who manages whom, and more about who influences whom and what areas of expertise each person has and what projects each person is working on.

So, we tried something new.  We took one of our IdeaPaint walls and tried to make an "influence chart" where everyone filled out themselves and added black lines to your manager and blue lines to people who influence you.  Here it is:

organization chart org chart 2 resized 600

Interesting...  While a cool experiment, I actually think this does not quite work, for a couple reasons.  First, it is confusing and hard to decipher.  Second, the lines are not directional, so you don't know the direction of influence.  Third, and most importantly, because it is missing the areas of expertise.  This chart is still about "who" and not about "what".  We need an online system where you can type in a subject or project and get back a list of people.  What might work better (and perhaps our next experiment) will be to use our internal wiki and allow people to tag themselves with areas of expertise and projects, and then make that searchable.

What do you think?  What should version 2.0 of the Org Chart look like?

Free Webinar: Website Redesign for 2010

website redesign webinar Learn how to redesign your website with an internet marketing strategy in mind with Mike Volpe, HubSpot's VP of Marketing.

Download the Webinar Nowand learn how to turn your website into an internet marketing machine.

Tags: , ,

COMMENTS

I applaud you on your flat structure. It's something many companies want or say they do, but few actually succeed.  
 
I think the best way to address your challenge is to have subject experts who are the go-to people when it comes to specific topics. This would be a great way for employees to explore areas they are interested in, but may not normally get to leverage in their day-to-day work.

posted @ Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:42 AM by karen turner


Great work, Mike. However, I would wonder whether the exercise was incomplete give the amazing chart above. You have identified what's missing from the chart so shouldn't you now add those data points to each name? Shouldn't you now do the following: 
 
1. Add directional lines? 
2. Add line strength  
3. Add titles to each name. HubSpotters have titles even in a flat org yes? 
4. Look at successful org chart models and overlay the final version to identify best fit 
5. Optimize/rationalize as needed. 
 
I'm wondering whether you can have a better picture after you make those adjustments and then look to tell the bigger story of what the org looks like. 
 
I wouldn't be surprised if a nice, neat structure eventually came together as a result.

posted @ Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:06 PM by Taariq Lewis


I think that's a great idea. Have a list of employees and then tag them by topic/job type, say: web dev, hr, marketing, accounting . . . whatever and then tag people's skill level/time at company, so as an expert, novice, good teacher. Imagine if you could tag all employees by their strengths and experiences. I am thinking about an old job where I managed production, but went on to run the advertising group, so I knew all the web dev stuff. I wasn't in web dev, and by an org chart I wouldn't have been in production either, but I was a (tag me as this) a. friendly-type, b. expert, c. production, d. web dev, e. advertising, f. content production, g. copy editor in a pinch. If a new person searched by tags or keywords I would come up as the person to go to if a typo was found on a random page that did not live in the CMS.

posted @ Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:14 PM by Erin


I've been working inside of Salesforce a lot lately and wonder if there could be a revamped use of Cases to handle situations like this. I imagine there must be some recurring situations that would fit well into "Case Scenarios". Then, members of the organization could go into Salesforce, type out the type of situation they're having, and then find the appropriate solution/article that fits their current challenge at hand. 
 
Combined with the wiki, creation of Camtasia videos for tutorials, and case studies, this could be a powerful resource.  
 
I would love to see how HubSpot implements something like this as I know there are plenty of organizations facing this same kind of challenge.  
 

posted @ Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:56 PM by Jeff Machado


Comments have been closed for this article.