Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Connect with Mike

mike volpe twitter mike volpe facebook mike volpe linkedin mike volpe youtube mike volpe blog rss mike volpe google buzz Mike Volpe on Foursquare mike volpe slideshare mike volpe itunes podcast mike volpe qik live video


Marketing with Mike Volpe

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

What ClickableNow Should Do for Twitter Background Success

Posted by Mike Volpe on Wed, Jul 29, 2009
 

My friend Todd Defren from Shift Communications is part of a project to help make links in a Twitter background clickable as announced on Mashable.  A worthy goal! 

[Correction: When first published this post said the pricing was $20/month.  I was wrong.  The cost is $20 for a "lifetime" at the time ClickableNow launched.  I still don't think this changes their business problem.]

ANOTHER UPDATE: Clickable now has made some changes and is now FREE!

clickablenow logo

I have not talked to Todd about this project.  But from my current understanding I think the business model is flawed.  If you pay $20 you can make the links clickable on your profile for anyone who has installed the Firefox addon from ClickableNow.  Here is the big problem.  The business model relies on a large number of users installing an add-on, and there is no incentive to install the add on.

Why would I pay $20 to reach a tiny number of people that have installed the add-on?  I won't.  I also won't install the add on to be able to click on the tiny number of users that have added the clickable links.  Chicken and the egg.

Here are some suggestions for ClickableNow to drive more adoption:

  1. Partner with an existing Firefox add-on with a big user base and add the ClickableNow functionality to it to get an instant large base of users who can click on the links.
  2. Price the monthly fee for adding the clickable links to your Twitter page based on the number of people that have installed the add on.  Today it would be $0.10 a month or something.  As more people install it, the price goes up for everyone to a max of $20.
  3. Same as above, except let the early users lock in the low price.  The first 10,000 installers pay $1 a month.  Then $2 for the next 10,000, up to a max price of $20.
  4. Price the links on a CPC (cost per click) basis, so as a marketer I only pay for the clicks I get, and this will scale with the number of users.
  5. Give away a simple version of the clickable links for free (maybe one link with no tracking stats) and then charge for more advanced version (multiple links and/or tracking stats).

What other ideas do you have to make the ClickableNow business model work?


Tags: ,

COMMENTS

Great idea Mike, when I saw this I definitely saw it as a non-starter as it is. 
 
I agree with the pay per click or 1 for free model. You have whet people's appetite. 
 
As it stands right now they won't build up any users or traffic.

posted @ Wednesday, July 29, 2009 10:45 AM by Adam Covati


Great ideas all around Mike. Really looking forward to see where Todd and the team step in a go from here. 
 
The CPC model has legs and is easily something I could see twitter integrating into their own services down the road.

posted @ Wednesday, July 29, 2009 10:56 AM by Ryan Kelley


Good point. Pricing a new paradigm too high is death. Better to seed the market and get people talking.

posted @ Wednesday, July 29, 2009 10:58 AM by Jeff Ogden


what are the current numbers on % of users who actually go to twitter.com to see updates? I recall seeing something saying that majority of users accessed through 3rd party client (tweetdeck, seesmic, etc) of course that may change as service gets more popular and twitter improves UI...

posted @ Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:46 AM by Todd Randolph


@Todd Randolph - Good point that a lot of Twitter usage is not on the web, but a lot of it still is - about 50%.  
 
 
 
Data here: http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/4584/New-Data-on-Top-Twitter-Applications-and-Usage.aspx

posted @ Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:06 PM by Mike Volpe


Comments have been closed for this article.